Search for: "Wood v. Owings & Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
In Caparo v Dickman Lord Bridge cautioned against discussing duties of care in abstract terms divorced from factual context: “It is never sufficient to ask simply whether A owes B a duty of care. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  (By the courts of appeals’ calculations, for example, Conestoga Wood would be liable for at least $95,000 a day; and Hobby Lobby would owe at least $1.3 million a day.) [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
On 8 April 2019, spent the best part of a day reading the UK government’s Online Harms White Paper, I concluded that if the road to hell was paved with good intentions, this was a motorway. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Thus, the conclusory allegations against [him] are insufficient to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) analysis and, as such, [he] has been fraudulently joined and should be dismissed.Id. at *3.A similar ruling from our neck of the woods (Pennsylvania) occurred in Positive Results Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
(Following what I still regard to be the manifestly wrong judgment of the Court of Appeal in Smith v Khan (2018) EWCA Civ 1137 (our note)). [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm by Francis Pileggi
For example, the agreements at issue did not disclaim the fiduciary duty of loyalty, and therefore, the general partner owed fiduciary duties to the limited partners, similar to those owed by directors of Delaware corporations. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am by John-Paul Boyd
A few years ago I was doing some work for a professional association on guidelines for dealing with litigants without counsel and I was struck by the extent to which some legal professionals regard litigants without counsel as interlopers who gum up the finely tuned, well-oiled machine that is their justice system. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]