Search for: "Wood v. Owings & Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
In Caparo v Dickman Lord Bridge cautioned against discussing duties of care in abstract terms divorced from factual context: “It is never sufficient to ask simply whether A owes B a duty of care. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  (By the courts of appeals’ calculations, for example, Conestoga Wood would be liable for at least $95,000 a day; and Hobby Lobby would owe at least $1.3 million a day.) [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
On 8 April 2019, spent the best part of a day reading the UK government’s Online Harms White Paper, I concluded that if the road to hell was paved with good intentions, this was a motorway. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm by Eric J. Shindler
  Interstate offered to “participate” in the defense of Intergulf through the firm of Wood, Smith Henning & Berman. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Thus, the conclusory allegations against [him] are insufficient to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) analysis and, as such, [he] has been fraudulently joined and should be dismissed.Id. at *3.A similar ruling from our neck of the woods (Pennsylvania) occurred in Positive Results Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:53 am
Co. of Am. v Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood, 80 NY2d 377, 605 N.E.2d 318, 590 N.Y.S.2d 831). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
(Following what I still regard to be the manifestly wrong judgment of the Court of Appeal in Smith v Khan (2018) EWCA Civ 1137 (our note)). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Rogers Group, Inc. , 548 So. 2d 740, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (finding construction laborer’s injuries arising from personal lunch debt was compensable as employment placed construction workers in close proximity, combatants’ relationship originated at work, and wood used in altercation was implement of employment); Sentry Ins. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
Smith’s book contains valuable information, but it has many flaws and badly needs updating. [read post]