Search for: "Wood v. Powers" Results 221 - 240 of 847
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
Issues: (1) Whether the Federal Communications Commission’s assumption of gatekeeper power over new methods of communication, “in the most important place [] for the exchange of views[,] … the ‘vast democratic forums of the Internet,’” violates the First Amendment; (2) whether the radical reinterpretation of the Communications Act of 1934 by the FCC is entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
Wellner, 17-1318, addressing whether the Federal Arbitration Act pre-empts a Kentucky common-law power-of-attorney rule. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
Wellner, 17-1318 Issue: Whether Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act pre-empts the Kentucky Supreme Court’s newly announced rule holding that a power of attorney authorizing the holder to enter into “contracts of every nature in relation to both real and personal property” does not encompass arbitration agreements because those agreements instead relate to rights to trial by jury and access to court. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Lloyd v Google LLC, heard 21 to 23 May 2018 (Warby J) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:01 am by Anushka Limaye
Circuit heard McKeever v Sessions, a case concerning the court’s power to release material protected under grand jury secrecy—which could have significant implications for whether Special Counsel Robert Mueller will be able to release a reporton on his investigation. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance The ECHR case of Big Brother Watch and Others v UK sheds light on the application of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 to GCHQ investigative measures involving the interception of communications. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Jonathan Wood
More than a decade after Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:31 am by coghlani
The Daily Sketch, 11th December 1913, covering the appeal of Bebb v The Law Society. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
Senators Howard Metzenbaum found a powerful cosponsor for his gun ban: South Carolina Republican Strom Thurmond. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Privacy International has reported on a recent finding of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal of which found that foreign secretaries illegally gave GCHQ overly extensive mandates to collect data. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Patricia Londono on UKHRB, “Sir Cliff v BBC: A new era for police investigations? [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:20 am
This issue, the Registrar observed, was not yet decided by the Singapore courts, although it was previously considered in another IPOS decision (Christie Manson & Woods Limited v Chritrs Auction Pte. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm by Stephanie Zable
(ZTE is not out of the woods yet, however: The Senate has passed language to revoke the deal, creating friction between Congress and the White House.) [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
” Briefly: At the Pacific Legal Foundation blog, Jonathan Wood argues that the foundation’s pending petition in California Sea Urchin Commission v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:18 am
The CJEU is under a duty to exercise its powers in accordance with the general principles of EU law, including the principles of equal treatment and sound administration (Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM, C‑51/10 P). [read post]