Search for: "Wood v. Powers" Results 261 - 280 of 852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am by Emily Dai
Klehm and Kurup shared an audit of the FBI’s execution of its “Woods Procedures” for FISA applications. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Larry Klein v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
Two powerful and opposing undercurrents run through the Hobby Lobby case. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
The Ohio Willow Wood Company, No. 15-567 Allvoice Developments US, LLC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 5:26 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Linde v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:20 am
This issue, the Registrar observed, was not yet decided by the Singapore courts, although it was previously considered in another IPOS decision (Christie Manson & Woods Limited v Chritrs Auction Pte. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  The short answer is, “No,” as the Third Circuit correctly held in Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 10:57 am by Giles Peaker
In Climie v Wood (1868-69) L.R. 4 Exch 328 the Court of Appeal had held: “There is no doubt that sometimes things annexed to land remain chattels as much after they have been annexed as they were before. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Especially in view of the 1976 amendment to the FDCA which specified the powers of the Secretary in regulating medical devices, any state law which would put these same powers in other hands must be deemed foreclosed. . . . [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Especially in view of the 1976 amendment to the FDCA which specified the powers of the Secretary in regulating medical devices, any state law which would put these same powers in other hands must be deemed foreclosed. . . . [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Especially in view of the 1976 amendment to the FDCA which specified the powers of the Secretary in regulating medical devices, any state law which would put these same powers in other hands must be deemed foreclosed. . . . [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Especially in view of the 1976 amendment to the FDCA which specified the powers of the Secretary in regulating medical devices, any state law which would put these same powers in other hands must be deemed foreclosed. . . . [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Perry on the ground that it “gives politicians an indirect, backdoor veto – the power to pull the plug on a successful ballot measure simply by leaving it undefended in court. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee (whether IPRs violate Separation of Powers); Click-to-Call Tech, LP v. [read post]