Search for: "Wood v. Powers" Results 301 - 320 of 850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Wood’s opinion for the court in Michigan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
Reg. 359/09 (Renewable Energy Approvals under Part V.0.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The employee filed a human rights complaint in Wood v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm by Giesela Ruehl
There is no better example of this interaction than the Shape v Supreme litigation ongoing before Dutch courts, with the most recent decision in this dispute rendered in December 2019 in Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (“SHAPE”) et al v Supreme Site Service GmbH et al (Supreme), COURT OF APPEAL OF ‘s-HERTOGENBOSCH, Case No. 200/216/570/01, Ruling of 10 December 2019 (the ‘CoA Decision’). [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 16 to 19 April 2018, Nicklin J heard the trial in the case of Monir v Wood. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am by Matthew Flinn
In this case, Mr Malcolm pointed out that Article 8 is a very broad right (a point which has often been made in posts on this blog), and that it encompasses expansive and rather amorphous concepts such as a person’s “physical and psychological integrity” (Pretty v United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR 1 at [66]) and “personal autonomy“ (R (Wood) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 WLR 123 at [21]-[22]). [read post]
Notably, Judge Woods acknowledged that an agency rule is “entitled to a measure of respect, and the weight accorded to such interpretations depends on their thoroughness, validity, consistency and power to persuade,” but then concluded that the DOL’s interpretation is “unpersuasive, [] conflicts with prior Department interpretations [,] . [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
On 14 October 2015, HHJ Graham Wood QC gave judgment in the case of Elliott v Staffordshire Police dismissing a slander claim arising out of comments made in a child protection conference. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The Blog has also highlighted the recent Supreme Court case of Carpenter v United States, which clarified the governments’ powers to obtain cell phone records via warrants. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:01 am by Anushka Limaye
Circuit heard McKeever v Sessions, a case concerning the court’s power to release material protected under grand jury secrecy—which could have significant implications for whether Special Counsel Robert Mueller will be able to release a reporton on his investigation. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm by Adam Feldman
This made the recent spat between Chief Justice John Roberts and President Donald Trump over the role of partisanship in the federal judiciary all the more surprising and powerful. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Code § 19-1-29.5-13, does not specifically limit the mayor's power to appoint a chief of police. [read post]