Search for: "Wood v. Powers" Results 341 - 360 of 857
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2016, 7:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But we are bound by our Court’s decision in Sutherland v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Steve Lubet
Reingold, MD Professor of Epidemiology University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Dharam V. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
We are loath to give the government the power to punish us for our thoughts and not our actions. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am by INFORRM
The Watson case concerned UK legislation which was implemented afterwards: the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act (DRIPA). [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:39 am by MBettman
Arguing Counsel Carrie Wood, Assistant State Public Defender, Office of Ohio Public Defender, Columbus, for Appellant Tyrone Noling Victor V. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Dennis Crouch
HP, No 15-1330 (separation of powers and right to jury trial). [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
That left Di Palma v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR CD149 and Wood v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR CD69, both of which found court as public authority not an issue when the court “merely provided a forum for the determination of the civil right in dispute between the parties”. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Writing for the Brookings Institution, Lisa V. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am by INFORRM
 Professor Lorna Woods discusses the report here. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee (whether IPRs violate Separation of Powers); Click-to-Call Tech, LP v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 1:28 pm by John Lewis and Dustin Dow
Without his power of persuasion on the Court, particularly with respect to FAA pro-arbitration policy, how much room is there for Judge Wood’s reasoning to prevail? [read post]