Search for: "Wood v. Powers"
Results 501 - 520
of 749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 10:24 am
She calls attention to U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
In last week’s case (Wood Atkinson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
In last week’s case (Wood Atkinson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:25 am
In Price v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:06 am
(In Administration) v Styles & Wood Ltd. [2011] EWHC 3464 (TCC) (22 December 2011) Alstom Power Ltd v Somi Impianti SRL [2011] EWHC 3941 (TCC) (21 December 2011) Leander Construction Ltd v Mulalley & Company Ltd [2011] EWHC 3449 (TCC) (21 December 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
In this case, Mr Malcolm pointed out that Article 8 is a very broad right (a point which has often been made in posts on this blog), and that it encompasses expansive and rather amorphous concepts such as a person’s “physical and psychological integrity” (Pretty v United Kingdom (2002) 35 EHRR 1 at [66]) and “personal autonomy“ (R (Wood) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 WLR 123 at [21]-[22]). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:36 am
He quotes Kramer's discussion of the 1958 decision in Cooper v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:55 am
The Eighth Circuit's case of United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:11 am
V. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
King & Wood (Wang Rongkang:Decent English Skills, M & A) 3. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:46 am
That’s because the Supreme Court recently ruled in American Electric Power v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
Professor Lorna Woods raises the question of whether Sky is a “fit and proper person” to hold a broadcasting licence, on the City Legal Research blog. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
, 115 PENN STATE LAW REVIEW 341 (2010)Marc Edelman, Does the NBA still have “market power? [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:19 am
Wickard v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
Kammen invoked Witherspoon v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Wood; reply by Alison L. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Wood, 246 Iowa 94, 100, 66 N.W.2d 841, 844 (1954). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 10:02 am
Osorio v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 10:02 am
Osorio v. [read post]
