Search for: "Wood v. Powers" Results 41 - 60 of 845
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Woods testified that depending on the issues identified in the audits different courses of action may be followed. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:58 am by Steven P. Farmer and Mark Booth
Such goods include certain cement products, hydrocarbons, fertilisers, wood, glass products, aluminium, turbojets, and vessels. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 01743-21 Power v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 08762-21 Nita v edinburghnews .scotsman.com, 14 Confidential sources (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 10375-21 Warde v Bridport & Lyme Regis News, 12 Discrimination (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 00505-22 Various v mirror.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action… [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 12:09 pm by Scott McKeown
  [Patent Owner] submits that the PTAB has subpoena power that would have allowed [challenger] to obtain confidential information regarding the MAK System, if necessary. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:19 pm by Florian Mueller
Comments on social media--or even court filings, such as in Coronavirus Reporter v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by The JAG HUNTER
Confronted by superior numbers and fire power, they retreated slowly, fighting doggedly for every inch of ground. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am by Emily Dai
Klehm and Kurup shared an audit of the FBI’s execution of its “Woods Procedures” for FISA applications. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
The Biden Administration faces strong pressure from large U.S. producers hungry for the lucrative Canadian distribution/retail sector who are politically powerful (e.g., Wisconsin) and unhappy that the United States did not get a better result in the CUSMA negotiations. [read post]