Search for: "Wood v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 1,192
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2021, 2:23 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
United States 21-171Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Compared to the rest of the world, the United States does not have a unique problem with tax evasion. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
United States Travis Price, a South Carolina man whose charges were dropped after police body camera footage showed he did not fight an officer who attacked him is suing the city of Rock Hill and U.S Rep. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Reviewed by Michael Woods. __________________ [1] Enbridge Energy Ltd. v State of Michigan, 2020 USDCWDMSD, Case 1:20-cv-01141 ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Online: < https://www.eenews.net/assets/2020/11/25/document_ew_05.pdf> [2] Enbridge Energy LP, supra note 1 at 1. [3] U.S.C. 6 [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
If I were to include a single additional case from a court, I would include one from a federal trial court rather than the Supreme Court: future Justice William Woods’s United States v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am by Arturo Jara
Notable Cast: Ruth Negga, Joel Edgerton, and Will Dalton.Director: Jeff NicholsYear: 2016IMDB Rating: 7.0/10Memorable Quote: “You realize this case could alter the Constitution of the United States? [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 9:30 am by Steve Gottlieb
One of my fellow students at law school was Drew Days, who became the first African-American head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and later Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Legal Aggregate
He founded the law school’s Environment and Natural Resources program and served as a special master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]