Search for: "Woods v. Etherton" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2016, 11:07 am by SupremeCourtHaiku
Anonymous tip Confrontation Clause not raised Habeas denied Opinion [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
  If that was her reason, in my judgment it overlooks the importance of Etherton LJ’s statement at [47] of Akhtar’s case. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
  If that was her reason, in my judgment it overlooks the importance of Etherton LJ’s statement at [47] of Akhtar’s case. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am by Amy Howe
”  And at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the summary reversal in Woods v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am by John Elwood
State-on-top habeas case Woods v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
  He further noted the words of Etherton J in  D Jacobson & Sons Ltd v Globe Ltd [2008] EWHC 88 (Ch) [noted by the IPKat here] that the survey had helped on the question of whether a mark had acquired distinctiveness.He also gave some thought as to how it might fit with other evidence to be provided:Before addressing the "likely to be of real value" test derived from Interflora 1, it may be helpful to discuss the point summarised at paragraph 17(4) and… [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by John Elwood
  And so it was that, as foretold, respondent in four-time relist Woods v. [read post]