Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 221 - 240 of 2,146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
There is no apparent reason to believe that things have significantly improved since then.The decline in AC revenues over the last 11 years had NOTHING to do with the 2012 legislation that added the word “education” to s. 29 of the Copyright Act. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court's decision rejecting Petitioner's motion "to reargue and review" is set out below: 2023 NY Slip Op 32352(U) Docket Number: Index No. 156145/2022 This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court's decision rejecting Petitioner's motion "to reargue and review" is set out below: 2023 NY Slip Op 32352(U) Docket Number: Index No. 156145/2022 This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Ronald M. Levin
Texas had a kind word to say about it. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by ilyabeylin
  The opinion cites Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
’” The word “focus” appears 36 times in the majority opinion and 43 times in Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence. [read post]
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
Supreme Court held that it would violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment for Colorado to force a website designer to create a wedding website for a same-sex couple, because it would compel her to create speech in which she did not believe (303 Creative LLC, et al. v. [read post]