Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 41 - 60 of 2,175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2024, 8:00 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Even if the award is passed, the court could invoke its powers u/s 29A. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm by centerforartlaw
The international scope of Nazi art looting makes the Supreme Court’s decision in Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 9:00 am by Jack Goldsmith
[C.3] We fear that this strangely worded passage imposes a novel and super-broad speech-harming duty to preclear. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:36 pm
There, with tears, she poured forth words attuned, lamenting, in a low voice, her very woes, as when the swan, now about to die, sings his own funereal dirge. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 12:39 pm by Josh Blackman
"Thoughtful" is the sort of word that law professors love to use. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
  Certain of these items also use the word “material”, such as the disclosure requirement of “management’s role in assessing and managing the registrant’s material climate-related risk” (Item 1501(b)) and “any processes the registrant has for identifying, assessing and managing material climate-related risks” (Item 1503(a)). [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:08 am by Marcel Pemsel
Pictures, motifs, symbols and words on the front and the back of articles of clothing are not generally perceived to be indictors of origin. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by JB
Why would the Reconstruction Congress, which sought to stamp out rebellion, and in Mark Graber’s words, “reward loyalty, [and] punish treason,” have wanted this result? [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 6:13 am by Asude
APEDA’s application to register the word BASMATI as a certification mark in that country was opposed due to lack of distinctiveness and insufficient certification rules. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 2:29 am by Marcel Pemsel
The classical understanding of the word requires a physical combination of two parts. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 9:57 am by Phil Dixon
In the Court’s words: “The latter forms of testimony allow forensic expertise to inform a criminal case without violating the defendant’s right of confrontation. [read post]