Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm
" Whole Women's Health v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:10 am
Oliveira], 586 U. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
S. 522, the Act says not a word about postjudgment discovery in aid of execution. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
S., at 285 (Scalia, J., dissenting) (“The use of the word ‘legitimate’ connotes an objective standard of ‘medicine’”); Moore, 423 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:16 am
S. 522, 539-541 (1987) (rejecting First Amendment challenge to law prohibiting certain unauthorized uses of the word “Olympic” and recognizing that such uses harm the U. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
Case citation: US v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 12:25 pm
Wilfred U. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
S. 576, and Shalala v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
S. 576, and Shalala v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
” 35 U. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
(It's true that the victim testified that she didn't learn about the U-visa program until after her initial testimony at the preliminary hearing, which is indeed a huge problem with the defense, but a jury need not take her word for that fact -- just as they need not necessarily take her word about the underlying domestic violence.)Similarly, the Court of Appeal notes that there was indeed a difference in the testimony that she gave in the… [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
Should words be read with the times, or should the times be stuck with the words. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:15 am
The question in that case is whether the word “expenses” includes the government’s attorneys’ fees. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:01 am
The ruling overturned the Court’s previous decision in the 1986 case Bowers v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:37 pm
S. 73, 80 (2002) (quoting United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:28 pm
S. 144, 181 (1992) (quoting Coleman v. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 9:38 am
C. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
S. 199, 207 (1990); see also Illinois Brick, 431 U. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:12 pm
Stanford v. [read post]
