Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2023, 5:41 am
The court, affirming a grant of summary judgment to a consortium of American cheesemakers against a challenge from their Swiss and French counterparts, also found that the district court’s decision was supported by evidence of gruyere consumption from other regions—including domestic production—as well as by multiple references in the media to gruyere as a generic product (Interprofession du Gruyère v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
For example, Lyng repeatedly emphasized that the "crucial word in the constitutional text"—and, thus, in the Court's analysis—"is 'prohibit'"—a word that isn't used in RFRA. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:02 am
Urt. v. 2.6.2022 – 6 U 40/22, GRUR-RS 2022, 22858 The trade mark owner claimed that his trade mark rights had been infringed, and he applied for injunctive remedies. [read post]
9 May 2010, 2:52 pm
S. 171, 175 (1991); see also Moran v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
In Minnesota Voters Alliance v Mansky, 585 U. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 5:12 am
S. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 12:33 pm
S. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:30 am
In Matz v Aboulafia Law Firm, LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 32147(U) October 10, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 155506/2016 Judge: Kathryn E. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
S. 91, 96–97 (2011); see 35 U. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm
" Whole Women's Health v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
S., at 285 (Scalia, J., dissenting) (“The use of the word ‘legitimate’ connotes an objective standard of ‘medicine’”); Moore, 423 U. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
S. 522, the Act says not a word about postjudgment discovery in aid of execution. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:10 am
Oliveira], 586 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:16 am
S. 522, 539-541 (1987) (rejecting First Amendment challenge to law prohibiting certain unauthorized uses of the word “Olympic” and recognizing that such uses harm the U. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 11:20 am
Case citation: US v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
S. 576, and Shalala v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
S. 576, and Shalala v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
(It's true that the victim testified that she didn't learn about the U-visa program until after her initial testimony at the preliminary hearing, which is indeed a huge problem with the defense, but a jury need not take her word for that fact -- just as they need not necessarily take her word about the underlying domestic violence.)Similarly, the Court of Appeal notes that there was indeed a difference in the testimony that she gave in the… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
” 35 U. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
Should words be read with the times, or should the times be stuck with the words. [read post]