Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2015, 7:17 am
Caballes, 543 U. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
S. 861, 872 (2000); Crosby v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
New Hampshire, 312 U. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:47 am
In other words, the expected return is largely if not entirely a function of the viator’s life expectancy. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 7:00 am
Giving the words, `over the course of time,’ `their usual and accepted meanings,’ Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 10:01 pm
Quoting CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
Bayer Corp., 564 U. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 6:47 am
Cross-posted on http://piracy-law.com/2014/02/15/dismissal-of-charges-in-u-s-v-ali/Filed under: IntLawGrrls Tagged: Facilitation of Piracy, Milena Sterio, piracy, universal jurisdiction [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:07 pm
" Dolan v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 8:04 am
Luxshare, Ltd. and Alixpartners, LLP, et al., v. the Fund for Protection of Investor’s Rights in Foreign States. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:39 pm
” Mazer v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:04 am
In Ţîmpău v Romania [2023] ECHR 982, the applicant, Doina Ţîmpău, challenged her dismissal as a lay teacher of Orthodox religion in a public school. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
" 591 U. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 4:10 am
Court vacates hearing officer’s disciplinary determination after finding that it was arbitrary and capriciousTrupiano v Meadow Union Free School Dist., 2010 NY Slip Op 32264(U), August 10, 2010, Supreme Court, Nassau County, Judge: Michele M. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 1:30 pm
August 12, 2020 U.S. v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:17 am
In other words, Ashcroft is a nice addition to any federal court defendant's arsenal. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:19 pm
Though we do not have a 5th Amendment, Canadians have long had a right to silence which is now constitutionally entrenched in s. 7 of the Charter (see R. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division then held that "the repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a applies retroactively to records created prior to June 12, 2020", citing Schenectady Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Schenectady, 2020 WL 7978093; 2020 NY Slip Op 34346[U]. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division then held that "the repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a applies retroactively to records created prior to June 12, 2020", citing Schenectady Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Schenectady, 2020 WL 7978093; 2020 NY Slip Op 34346[U]. [read post]
