Search for: "Word v. U.s" Results 1 - 20 of 14,276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The case raised the question whether the U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Richard Hunt
Coleman, 455 U.S. 363, 102 S.Ct. 1114 (1982). [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Yet the words of Justice Kennedy writing for the Court in Montgomery v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
’” In other words, women’s freedom rests squarely on their access to contraception. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
According to news reports, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a judge on the Chicago-based U.S. [read post]
The federal district court in Manhattan erred in concluding as a matter of law that Costco’s use of the word “Tiffany” to describe diamond engagement rings amounted to willful trademark infringement and counterfeiting, warranting compensatory and punitive damages exceeding $21 million, the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:55 am by Jennifer Rossettini, CFP®
  In other words, it protects one’s beneficiaries from the claims of their creditors. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:55 am by Jennifer Rossettini, CFP®
  In other words, it protects one’s beneficiaries from the claims of their creditors. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm by Tobias Lutzi
In Honda Motor Co v Oberg (512 U.S. 415 (1994)), for instance, Ginsburg dissented from the Court’s decision that an amendment to the Oregon Constitution that prevented review of a punitive-damage award violated the Due Process Clause of the federal Constitution, referring to other protections against excessive punitive-damage awards in Oregon law. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 3:27 pm by fvanloon
Embassy in Kyiv mentioning Burisma (Judicial Watch v. [read post]