Search for: "Work v. Leathers"
Results 41 - 60
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2021, 5:15 am
Bayer Consumer Care AG, No. 21-195 (impact of foreign use on trademark rights in the US); Australian Leather Pty. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm
Holder), and overruled earlier decisions involving antitrust (Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:27 pm
It is leather-ish, has a cover with a clasp, and a shoulder strap. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 6:56 am
Sara Designs, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:54 pm
It was hard, repetitive work. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Grimaldi) whereby the right to protect a registered trade mark (a protection given in the USA law essentially by the Lanham Act), under some circumstances, cannot be enforced to detriment of “the right of others to express themselves freely in their own artistic work” (from the Rogers v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
Sometimes good old fashioned shoe leather might be put to work to check out the property in question; even a knock on the door to ensure that the owner is actually refinancing by way of a new mortgage. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Barnes v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:39 pm
This is an action for annulment brought by the owner of the national word mark TOSCA for perfumes against the Board of Appeal's decision to reject the Opposition Division's decision, which itself partially rejected the opposition to the application to register the figurative trade mark TOSKA LEATHER in respect of products falling in Classes 16, 18 and 25.* There's also judgment in Case T-192/04 Flex Equipos de Descanso v OHIM - Leggett & Platt (LURA-FLEX). [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 6:29 am
” FOURNIE v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:16 pm
Totes-Isotoner Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:47 am
Leathers, 475 So.2d 1329, 1330 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 7:31 am
A very clever design that seemed like it would only work with that particular brand. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:13 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:36 am
., Serial No. 77219184 [Refusal to register the mark depicted below, consisted of "the configuration of interlaced woven strips of leather forming a repeating weave pattern used over all or substantially all of the goods," for wallets, purses, and other leather goods, on the grounds of aesthetic and utilitarian functionality, mere ornamentality, and lack of acquired distinctiveness].October 5, 2011 - 2 PM: Companhia de Bebidas das Americas v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Dressed in dark slacks, work shirt, and hat United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:36 pm
Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:36 pm
Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:11 pm
From Hermes Int'l v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
(Trustee of) v. [read post]
