Search for: "Work v. Leathers" Results 41 - 60 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
 Sometimes good old fashioned shoe leather might be put to work to check out the property in question; even a knock on the door to ensure that the owner is actually refinancing by way of a new mortgage. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:39 pm
This is an action for annulment brought by the owner of the national word mark TOSCA for perfumes against the Board of Appeal's decision to reject the Opposition Division's decision, which itself partially rejected the opposition to the application to register the figurative trade mark TOSKA LEATHER in respect of products falling in Classes 16, 18 and 25.* There's also judgment in Case T-192/04 Flex Equipos de Descanso v OHIM - Leggett & Platt (LURA-FLEX). [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 7:31 am
A very clever design that seemed like it would only work with that particular brand. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 12:40 pm
Finally, parts five and six highlight remaining issues and conclude.. . . . .V. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:36 am by John L. Welch
., Serial No. 77219184 [Refusal to register the mark depicted below, consisted of "the configuration of interlaced woven strips of leather forming a repeating weave pattern used over all or substantially all of the goods," for wallets, purses, and other leather goods, on the grounds of aesthetic and utilitarian functionality, mere ornamentality, and lack of acquired distinctiveness].October 5, 2011 - 2 PM: Companhia de Bebidas das Americas v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Dressed in dark slacks, work shirt, and hat United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:24 am
 They're less descriptive, but either name would look really keen on the back of a leather jacket.Other suggestions, genuine or fanciful, anyone? [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 7:20 am by LawDiva
If you thought you had an ugly divorce, you may reconsider after hearing about Nozolino v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm by David Goldstein
Actavis, 570 U.S. __ (2013) (rule of reason applies to pharmaceutical reverse payment settlements); Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877 (2007) (rule of reason applies to resale price maintenance). [read post]