Search for: "Work v. Leathers"
Results 101 - 120
of 158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2012, 6:24 am
Day declared that, if the debit card and/or pin number did not work, he would return and kill Becker. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 5:07 pm
I love the limited edition Microsoft wireless mouse with black leather palm-contact areas. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:52 pm
" Attorneys on the lawsuit, K.C. et. al v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 7:04 am
” Clearly nothing says “dependable financial advice” better than Patrick Swayze in a leather jacket. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:17 pm
So here's an excerpt about a kooky little copyright case called Strachborneo v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 6:04 am
” Moreover, the vast majority of the donning and doffing time in question here was spent changing “clothes,” as defined by the Supreme Court in Sandifer v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
KenzoKatThe fashion house opposed both relying on it its KENZO EUTM in classes 3 (cosmetics etc), 18 (leather goods) and 25 (clothing). [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:59 pm
Bakke (1977); and Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
(Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) Hill Times features op-ed by Michael Geist concerning copyright lobby recycling (Michael Geist) Owner of Glo Salon and Spa sues former employees now working at competitor for $6.4 million in damages over alleged misappropriation of trade secrets in the form of client lists and client colour cards (IP Osgoode) Federal court issues practice direction aimed at streamlining complex litigation (International Law Office) China Get involved in Chinese… [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am
Professor Stephen Mayson, whose work I have known for many years, is always worth listening to. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:52 pm
The Walker v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
While fashion collections typically bear the name of a single creative director, the reality MSCHF strives to highlight is that the work involves the contributions of numerous craftspeople, often numbering in the tens or even hundreds. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 7:12 am
Steven V. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
And in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
Khan, 522 U.S. 3 (1997); Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:24 am
Amusement Art, LLC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
While the Supreme Court didn’t cause that result directly, the lower courts that did cause it could not have done their work without reliance on two factually idiosyncratic opinions issued more than forty years ago. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 6:04 pm
Pharm, the plaintiff advocated that the defendant should bear the burden of proving its homeopathic remedies worked. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 8:33 pm
Before Brown v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:45 pm
" In the case of Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
