Search for: "Workers' Compensation Court v. State Ins. Fund" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2016, 10:12 am by Dean Freeman
That means if your workerscompensation benefits cover some aspect of your injuries that is later paid out by your UM carrier, your workerscompensation provider may be able to assert a lien on those funds. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
Generally, the Special Fund provides workers compensation to injured workers who suffered a “second injury,” and provides workers compensation in the event of employer insolvency.  [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:18 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
New York state amended its workers compensation statutes which since 1933 had provided for a special fund to cover claimants whose claims were closed, and then later reopened. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
While the Fund received notice of Tambini's accident four days after it occurred by way of the C-2 claim form seeking workers' compensation benefits, this notice did not satisfy plaintiff's separate obligation to provide prompt notice of the third-party lawsuit that had been commenced against it (see T & S Masonry v State Ins. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:36 am by Dustin C. Blumenthal
MCM subsequently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which stayed the state court litigations. [read post]