Search for: "Working Families Party v. Com." Results 1 - 20 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
The integrity of the family unit has found protection in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Meyer v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
Applying Stack and Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, the judge at first instance accepted this contention, stating that he had to consider what was just and fair between the parties having regard to the whole course of dealing between them. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
Ditto for the court’s work in State v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 3:41 pm by familoo
“All-ca-ses-must-be-com-ple-ted-in-twen-ty-six-weeks…You-must-com-ply. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 9:32 am by Russell Knight
Most other married couples seem to work their problems out. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
When a fee claimant seeks to recover attorney's fees from an opposing party, it must put on evidence of reasonable hours worked multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate, yielding a base figure that can be adjusted by considerations not already accounted for in either the hours worked or the rate. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:47 am
  If this law thing isn’t going your way, you might want to think about working on an assembly line, like the plaintiff in Davis v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am by Sabrina McCubbin
Miller, which addressed police access to business records held by third parties; Smith v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
If the work is desirable enough, and a purchaser's time horizon is long enough, such a limited limitation on sale might potentially work to both parties' interests. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
When a fee claimant seeks to recover attorney's fees from an opposing party, it must put on evidence of reasonable hours worked multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate, yielding a base figure that can be adjusted by considerations not already accounted for in either the hours worked or the rate. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 5:59 am by Terry Hart
Other examples include MP3.com,3UMG Recordings v MP3.Com, 92 F.Supp.2d 349 (SDNY 2000) (“although defendant seeks to portray its service as the ‘functional equivalent’ of storing its subscribers’ CDs, in actuality defendant is re-playing for the subscribers converted versions of the recordings it copied, without authorization, from plaintiffs’ copyrighted CDs. [read post]