Search for: "Worley v. Bounds"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
" Article VI uses different language: a covered position "shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Wilson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
The Article VI Oaths Clause provides: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution. [read post]