Search for: "Wright v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 1,080
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 3:49 am by INFORRM
On 11 November 2015, Sir Michael Tugendhat handed down judgment in the appeals of Bates v Weston; and Leeds United Football v Weston [2015] EWHC 3070 (QB). [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
Article III provides that federal courts may hear “cases” and “controversies,” including “all cases, in law and equity, arising under . . . the laws of the United States . . . . [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 10:26 am by Deborah Pearlstein
”)While recognizing a very narrow preclusive presidential power that prohibits Congress from contradicting a position the President has previously taken on the political recognition of a foreign government, the Zivotofsky Court calls into fatal question its 1936 discussion in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Power of Public Labor Unions In California, as in many other states, a public sector bargaining unit may, by majority vote, elect to create an “agency shop” in which the union is the collective bargaining agent on behalf of all the employees. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:45 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
United States: The Right of the United States Citizens of Puerto Rico to Vote for the President and the Need to Re-evaluate America’s Territorial Policy. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Synthes United States Products, LLC, NO. 2:2015-cv-00295, 2015 U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:28 pm by Danny O'Brien
Anything less would be a violation of the United States' First Amendment. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
United Financial Group, 559 F.2d 557 (U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:52 am by Kathy Kreps
United States Steel Corp., an Indiana court found a co-worker’s Confederate flag tattoo “was not sufficiently severe and pervasive to establish a hostile work environment. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]