Search for: "Wright v. United States" Results 661 - 680 of 1,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am by Ronald Collins
Pamela Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, & Artemus Ward, The Puzzle of Unanimity: Consensus on the United States Supreme Court (Stanford Law Books, May 2013) Drawing on data from the U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am by Ken
In my post about Prenda Law's defamation lawsuits, I mentioned that Prenda is facing an inquiry by United States District Judge Otis Wright in Los Angeles. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perry, the plaintiffs challenge California’s voter-adopted ban on same-sex marriage (Proposition 8), and in the other, United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Hawaii: The so-called ‘Steven Tyler Act’, named after the lead singer of Aerosmith, will be considered in the state Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 11:32 am by Michelle Yeary
            The legal community is still buzzing about the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:22 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The United States Supreme Court, in cases such as Press-Enterprise Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:50 am by admin
  Although no charges have been laid to date, the Bureau has confirmed it is investigating alleged collusive conduct in the setting or manipulation of the Yen London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (the LIBOR case), which has been part of an ongoing investigation by competition and financial services regulators in various jurisdictions, including in the United States and Europe. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 930 F.2d 867, 871 n.2 (Fed. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:11 am by Jim Walker
   Delta towns like Money and Morgan City were (and remain) part of the most impoverished region in the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, is significant because: (1) it involves a dispute over some fundamental but complex First Amendment doctrinal principles; (2) it conflicts with a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and (3) (for reasons 1 and 2), it may very well end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]