Search for: "Wyoming v. Oklahoma" Results 41 - 60 of 197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 11:57 am by John Floyd
  In macabre detail, the Eighth Circuit issued a March 6, 2018 decision in Bucklew v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
Ohio, Texas, and Nevada all adopted gross receipts taxes in recent years, while eight states—California, Louisiana, Missouri, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Wyoming—contemplated their adoption this year. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:15 am by Eugene Volokh
In March, Wyoming law enforcement took $91,8000 from Phil Parhamovich at a roadside stop. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
Three of these states—Connecticut, New York, and Wyoming—impose taxes mirroring the old Ohio corporate franchise tax, under which businesses pay the greater of net worth or net income liability.[12] Beginning in 2006, Ohio CFT liability declined in increments of 20 percent a year, with firms responsible for 80 percent of their standard liability that year, 60 percent in 2007, and so on until 2010, when the tax was eliminated. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Come prepared for a lively, interactive workshop.World Café Hosts:Dayna Matthew, University of Colorado Law SchoolCharity Scott, Georgia State University College of LawSidney Watson, Saint Louis University School of LawInvited Discussants and Participants:Rodney Adams, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Health AdministrationChristina Juris Bennett, University of Oklahoma College of LawAmy Campbell, University of Memphis Cecil C. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 8:09 pm by Sme
Oklahoma Dept. of Mental Health (10th Circuit, March 30, 2017) (affirming dismissal of tort and free speech claims and of summary judgment in favor of Oklahoma on gender discrimination and retaliation claims because neither plaintiff could show pretext)Wages*Combs v. [read post]