Search for: "Wyoming v. Oklahoma" Results 81 - 100 of 216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Oklahoma Tax Commission, 611 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir. 2010) (ruling against tribal interests in tax dispute with state) United States v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
Wyoming (137 Original), involving a dispute over division of the waters of the Tongue and Powder Rivers under a 1951 Compact. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
  A broader formulation exempts anything that is government "regulated" (Alaska, Nebraska, Oklahoma). [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:16 am by Andis Kaulins
Cowboys by 52 Oklahoma State 70-7 Oklahoma State 59-13 Lamar v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 9:50 am by Charles Sartain
The appeals court overseeing district courts in Oklahoma, Kansas, New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming and Utah has held that companies may be criminally responsible. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
Wyoming, 17-532 (a wacky jurisdictional dispute involving Wyoming’s admission to the Union and Indian treaty rights) and Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
Robbins Co., 577 P.2d 975, 978 (Wash. 1978).Wyoming: Rohde v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Kyle Kroll
It’s the stuff of nightmares for procrastinating creators in Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Alabama, Georgia, and Florida! [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:22 pm by David J.B. Froiland
Last week, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming, plus the portions of Yellowstone National Park in Montana and Idaho) found that a careful “Termination Review” process by independent decision makers can weaken or break the causal connection between the alleged racial animus and the ultimate adverse action. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:04 am by Tammy Binford
That’s because those agencies issued guidance after the Supreme Court’s 2013 United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:22 pm by David J.B. Froiland
Last week, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming, plus the portions of Yellowstone National Park in Montana and Idaho) found that a careful “Termination Review” process by independent decision makers can weaken or break the causal connection between the alleged racial animus and the ultimate adverse action. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Cari Rincker
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]