Search for: "Wyoming v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2019, 2:00 am
Facts of Herrera v Wyoming An 1868 treaty between the United States and the Crow Tribe promised that in exchange for most of the Tribe’s territory in modern-day Montana and Wyoming, its members would “have the right to hunt on the unoccupied lands of the United States so long as game may be found thereon . . . and peace subsists . . . on the borders of the hunting districts. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
The case is State of Wyoming v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 4:04 pm
US State of Wyoming enacted a law concerning the creation of special purpose depository institutions which concern digital assets. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:08 am
Here: 2017-10-05 Herrera Cert Petition Question presented: Whether Wyoming’s admission to the Union or the establishment of the Bighorn National Forest abrogated the Crow Tribe of Indians’ 1868 federal treaty right to hunt on the “unoccupied lands of the United States,” thereby permitting the present-day criminal conviction of a Crow member who engaged in subsistence hunting for his family. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:41 am
2017-10-05 Herrera Cert Petition Question presented: Whether Wyoming’s admission to the Union or the establishment of the Bighorn National Forest abrogated the Crow Tribe of Indians’ 1868 federal treaty right to hunt on the “unoccupied lands of the United States,” thereby permitting the present-day criminal conviction of a Crow member who engaged in subsistence hunting for his family. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 1:36 pm
Results Wyoming’s push to become the cryptocurrency capital of the United States seems to have paid off in some regards. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 1:33 pm
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 1:33 pm
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 7:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 10:08 am
In response, the State of Wyoming argued—as it had successfully below—that the dispute was squarely governed by the Court’s decision in Ward v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:30 am
Petitioners-Appellants Greater Yellowstone Coalition, Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance, and Wyoming Outdoor Council (collectively GYC) sent a letter to the United States Forest Service (Forest Service") and the United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) requesting the agencies to undertake environmental analyses of Wyoming elk feedgrounds located on Federal land. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:18 am
Here: Federal Opening Brief Humane Society Opening Brief Idaho Opening Brief Montana Opening Brief Safari Club Opening Brief Sportsmen’s Alliance Opening Brief Wyoming Farm Bureau Opening Brief Wyoming Opening Brief Crow Answer Brief Northern Cheyenne Tribe Answer Brief Wildearth Guardians Answer Brief Alliance for the Wild Rockies Answer Brief Federal Reply Idaho Reply Montana Reply Brief Safari Club Reply Sportsmen’s Alliance Reply Wyoming Farm Bureau Reply… [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:25 am
Here is the abstract: In United States v.... [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Mockus for committing blasphemy during his lectures in State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 9:01 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, interpreting Wyoming law, recently held that a reservation-of-rights letter from an insurance company to its insured was not sufficient to allow the insurer to recoup the costs of defending the insured in construction litigation. [read post]
