Search for: "York Company v. Central Railroad" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
In this instance, America Premiere Underwriters, Inc. and New York & Harlem Railroad Company established as "out-of-possession" landlords they had no such duty. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:06 pm
Weissman argued that for nearly a century, judges, prosecutors and defense lawyers had misconstrued a 1909 Supreme Court decision, called New York Central and Hudson River Railroad v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Christopher Owens
NLRB, 424 U.S. 507 (1976); Central Hardware Co. v NLRB, 407 U.S. 539 (1972); Beth Israel Hosp. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
The amicus brief argues that the trial court gave a common instruction to the jury on vicarious liability based on a mistaken application of the Supreme Court's ruling in New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:28 am by Scott Bomboy
A New York City commission prohibited the Penn Central Railroad from redeveloping Grand Central Station after two plans substantially changed the building’s historic look above the building. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak observes that in Trump v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:08 pm by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
Walters, a railroad company challenged the constitutionality of a Tennessee law that imposed various costs related to railway crossings, and the trial court engaged in extensive fact-finding before striking down the statute as irrational. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 2:03 pm by scottgaille
While Baker Botts focused on representing New York corporations, V&E developed a niche with local Houston companies and independent oilmen: Vinson Elkins, unlike Baker & Botts, built its strength on local business. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
Jury Finds Plaintiffs Lawyers Defrauded Railroad in Asbestos Suit Corporate Counsel When a federal jury returned a verdict against two Mississippi plaintiffs lawyers, finding they had committed fraud against Illinois Central Railroad, it was the culmination of the railroad's seven-year battle against abusive asbestos claims. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 4:08 am by Jon Gelman
In 1918, the court overturned a law prohibiting child labor on similar grounds and additionally held that the effects of child labor did not have enough of an impact on interstate commerce to justify regulation.The Supreme Court did uphold the constitutionality of workers’ compensation laws in the case of New York Central Railroad v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm by Daniel Richardson
Rutland & Burlington Railroad Company, 27 Vt. 140 (1854) (the granddaddy of all police power decisions); Ploof v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Paul Morgan controlled several banks, Western Union, the Pullman Car Company, Aetna Life Insurance, General Electric and 2-1 railroad companies. [read post]