Search for: "Yorke v. Taylor"
Results 1 - 20
of 983
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2011, 4:25 am
Police sick-out violates Taylor Law Police Benevolent Association of the City of Yonkers v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Taylor appeared first on New York Estate Planning Lawyer Blog. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
Investigations and the Taylor lawCity of New York v DeCosta, 95 NY2d 2731. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:58 pm
In Patent Misjoinder(forthcoming New York University Law Review), Professor David Taylor provides a comprehensive analysis of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:55 am
Criminal investigations and the Taylor lawNew York City v Uniformed Fire Officers Asso., 95 NY2d 273With increasing frequency, procedures addressing employee rights in the course of an employer-initiated investigation are being included in Taylor Law agreements. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
In fact, this is exactly what happened in the recent New York case of Ferreira v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:13 am
Jurisdiction to resolve an impasse in collective bargaining under the Taylor LawPolice Benevolent Association v City of New York, 285 A.D.2d 52 In a unanimous ruling, the Appellate Division, Third Department, held that the New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB] has exclusive jurisdiction insofar as resolving Taylor Law impasse situations are concerned. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:11 am
Litigating the Taylor Law in federal courtSchermerhorn v Metropolitan Trans. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
A collective bargaining agreement [CBA] entered into pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the so-called Taylor Law, is a contract and must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms (Matter of Lin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 191 AD3d 431, leave to appeal denied, 37 NY3d 913). [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
A collective bargaining agreement [CBA] entered into pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the so-called Taylor Law, is a contract and must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms (Matter of Lin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 191 AD3d 431, leave to appeal denied, 37 NY3d 913). [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 5:47 pm
Appellate Term, First Department: Taylor v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:45 am
Limitations on collective bargaining under the Taylor LawCity of New York v Uniformed Fire Officers Asso. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:28 pm
Nixon Peabody v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Union rather than officers or board members to acknowledge it does not assert the right to violate the Taylor Law New York City Tr. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Union rather than officers or board members to acknowledge it does not assert the right to violate the Taylor LawNew York City Tr. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 8:26 am
In People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 5:21 am
Local 1000 AFSCME AFL-CIO v New York State Pub. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 5:41 am
Layoff, Taylor Law agreements and the Doctrine of Unintended Consequences A NYPPL review The Civil Service Employees Association [CSEA] has summarized the new “no layoff” Article set out in the several collective bargaining agreements between it and the State of New York for the period 2011-2016 as follows*: No Layoff – 1. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 1:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 11:45 am
” Judge Kavanaugh’s 10-page opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
