Search for: "Young v. Boy Scouts of America" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2007, 1:19 pm
KOSNOFF, and as their complaint against defendants, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC. and CHARLES BICKERSTAFF, they state as follows: COUNT I - NEGLIGENCE and BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY- BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA and BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC. 1. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 1:31 pm
KOSNOFF, and as their complaint against defendants, BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC. and CHARLES BICKERSTAFF, they state as follows: COUNT I - NEGLIGENCE and BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY- BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA and BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, INC. 1. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:17 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) From today’s Wyoming Supreme Court decision in Operation Save America v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 4:07 am by SHG
Boy Scouts of America, a 1997 case before the California Supreme Court, a girl sought to be a boy scout and the court held that the Boy Scouts were not a “business” and were permitted to exclude women from its ranks. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm by Hugh Rennie
Sepper explains that the right to expressive association was broadened by the Supreme Court in the case Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Boy Scouts of America (2000), which held that the Boy Scouts had a First Amendment right to exclude gays from being assistant scoutmasters, who helped convey the Scouts' values; the same, the court held, protected the Association's decisions: [T]he Bar Association qualifies as an expressive association, and … compelling it to end its practice of ensuring the presence of designated underrepresented groups in its leadership would… [read post]