Search for: "Young v. General Electric Co" Results 21 - 40 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2014, 10:35 am by Lyle Denniston
KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
  Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango)   Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46)   Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark BECKER… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Babbitt, 172 S.W.3d 786, 795 (Ky. 2005); Delaware Electric Co-op. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:04 pm by Andrew Hamm
The commission asks the justices to review the decision, with consequences for the Ex parte Young doctrine and interstate compacts more generally. 42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993); General Electric Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:49 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Dreamworks, its parent company Viacom Inc, and Universal Pictures, a unit of General Electric Co's NBC Universal, are accused of copyright infringement and breach of contract for making "Disturbia" without first obtaining permission from the copyright holders, the suit said. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Ranch royalty rate survey (IP finance) FreePatentsOnline: a remarkable symmetry - 'Flash of Genius' sponsorship of Patent Plaque Program (IP finance) Managing external patent specialists (Innovationpartners) The first step to generating revenue from 'patent monetisation' is understanding what the term means (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Think business cannot predict the future? [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
Consequently, the requested disclosure fits squarely within the policy rationale underlying the physician-patient privilege.IF OBJECT OF UTILITY FEES IS TO FUND A CITY’SGENERAL REVENUE, THE HANCOCK AMENDMENT IS VIOLATED.Arbor Investment Co. owns property in the City of Hermann and paid utility charges for gas, electricity, water/sewer and refuse/waste. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The PDA: The Early Years The PDA was enacted to reverse the Supreme Court’s 1976 ruling in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This law was passed in direct response to a bizarre Supreme Court ruling in General Electric v. [read post]