Search for: "Young v. Kelly"
Results 61 - 80
of 279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2009, 9:05 am
Yesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court heard oral argument in Kyser v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:35 am
The style of the case was Goodman v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 5:15 am
The court has ruled in Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 2:16 pm
Kelly, 401 A.2d 799 (Pa.S. 1979) Thompson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 7:17 am
During that conversation, plaintiffs demanded that a video, which they believed to be unsuitable for a young audience, not be played during an upcoming concert. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 10:40 am
Wainwright and Strickland v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 3:50 pm
Chief Justice Young and Justice Markman issued statements denying plaintiff’s motion seeking their respective disqualification in Parisi v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 11:42 am
Justice Young, joined by Justices Markman and Mary Beth Kelly, dissented from this May 25, 2012 order. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:44 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Young v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
On July 31, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a 4-3 opinion in People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:52 am
Congressman Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) and Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Ark.) have introduced a bill that they say would strengthen protections for pregnant women in the workplace in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Young v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:53 am
” Justice Markman authored the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Kelly and Justices Cavanagh, Corrigan, and Young. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 7:05 am
& Guaranty Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:57 am
Justice Young wrote essentially to urge the Legislature to undo recent Court case law from McCormick v Carrier on what constitutes “serious impairment” and make the exception tighter. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:44 am
In addition, a majority of the justices (Cavanagh, Kelly, Hathaway, and Weaver) determined that 11-carboxy-THC is not a schedule 1 controlled substance under MCL § 333.7212 of the Public Health Code and overruled People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 7:18 pm
Justices Corrigan, Markman, and Young dissented, stating that the "new majority" was ignoring (rather than overruling) settled precedent, such as Thornton v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Kelly Santini LLP’s Employment Law Blog for the Suddenly Unemployed 4. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:09 am
On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:42 am
Ohio v. [read post]
