Search for: "Young v. Reliance Elec. Co." Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2010, 1:39 pm
" Young, 492 F.3d at 1346 (internal citations and quotations marks omitted). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
Ernst & Young explained the structure of Rule 26 with respect to underlying documents, calculations, and data[7]. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Regardless, plaintiffs argued that they were entitled to strict scrutiny because required “sexually explicit” labels on video games had been struck down by the Seventh Circuit, and Brown v. [read post]