Search for: "Young v. Rice" Results 81 - 100 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:21 am
A recent decision handed down by the state's high court in Washington v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:24 am by Lawrence Solum
The key doctrinal tool in preemption cases is the “presumption against preemption” — a canon of statutory construction recognized by the Court in the 1947 case of Rice v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:18 am by Jennifer
King (Annex KF 228 .K36 K56 2006) Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:00 am
White is allergic to shrimp, she asked that the shrimp egg foo young, the shrimp fried rice, and the shrimp egg roll that were included in the special be substituted with chicken. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm by Jason Krebs
RETAIL CONSIGNEES FOR FSIS RECALL 034-2009 (EXPANDED) FSIS has reason to believe that the following retail location(s) received assorted beef products that have been recalled by JBS Swift Beef Company. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:54 am
Federal Election Commission (PDF 176 KB)Decision Released June 26, 2008 That Deems Unconstitutional the "Millionaire's Amendment"06/26/2008 Supreme Court Opinion: District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 5:56 pm
Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Carol Edmead ruled last week in Laddcap Value Partners, LP v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:10 am
We call this game in favor of Rice 28-27.Update: Did we say Rice? [read post]