Search for: "Young v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 6,824
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 208 F.3d 41, 44 (2d Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Boria v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
v=IIGyVa5Xftw#t=49 At the heart of the takedown decision is a fight over fair use in copyrights when mixed with commercial speech. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:18 pm
 Here's what the Court of Appeal says about it:"In Property Reserve v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
There were difficulties in accessing the relevant rules for information-sharing and there were insufficient safeguards in relation to the proportionality of any interference with art 8 83-84]: confidential information concerning a child or young person’s state of health (such as contraception, pregnancy or sexually transmitted disease) could be disclosed to a wide range of authorities without either the young person or the parents being aware of the art 8… [read post]
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:05 pm
On March 7, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Skinner v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
Young, 291 N.C. at 568, 231 S.E.2d at 581 (quotation marks, emphasis, and citation omitted); see Godinez v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:29 am by Emily Lonergan
I contemplated a post about the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. [read post]