Search for: "Young v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 8,675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
There is some authority on this point from the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:04 am by Steve Vladeck
More to the point, I wonder if others reading the book had the same reaction that I did--and have any explanation for why, of all the cases with which to end such a story, Justice Stevens decided to go with a little tiny case about the ability of state-created agencies to pursue relief under Ex parte Young? [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:21 am
A recent decision handed down by the state's high court in Washington v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:16 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Young will brief and argue in support of the Fifth Circuit’s ruling that a federal judge has the authority to set a federal sentence to run consecutively to a state sentence not yet imposed. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Jeffrey Brown
Feel free to e-mail me if you have suggestions for an upcoming list.GPS / JonesThe Missed Opportunity of United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 7:15 pm
Perles et al. v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 2:51 pm by Stephen D. Rosenberg
My thoughts on that led to an article, titled “The Centre Barely Holds: ERISA Preemption After Gobeille v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by Kali Borkoski
Young; opinion author boxed in red. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:39 am by rprybell
Valerie has argued* two cases before the United States Supreme Court in the last four years, Lafler v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 9:50 am by Lawrence Cunningham
  The Pats offered the ingenious argument that state anti-scalping laws rendered the practice of selling tickets at premiums unlawful. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:25 pm
New York State Division of Parole, Timothy Gutkaiss was serving a prison term for sodomy, stemming from an incident which reportedly involved his young nephew. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
There were difficulties in accessing the relevant rules for information-sharing and there were insufficient safeguards in relation to the proportionality of any interference with art 8 83-84]: confidential information concerning a child or young person’s state of health (such as contraception, pregnancy or sexually transmitted disease) could be disclosed to a wide range of authorities without either the young person or the parents being aware of the art 8… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 208 F.3d 41, 44 (2d Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Boria v. [read post]