Search for: "Young v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 8,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:05 pm
On March 7, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Skinner v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
Young, 291 N.C. at 568, 231 S.E.2d at 581 (quotation marks, emphasis, and citation omitted); see Godinez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:42 am by Gaëtan Gerville-Réache
  Justice Markman, joined by Justices Corrigan, Hathaway, and Young, delivered the opinion of the Court, overturning its 1982-decision in Silva v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am by Eric Goldman
  First, under the doctrine of Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), Congress can authorize private suits for prospective injunctions requiring state officials to uphold federal copyright law. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:29 am by Emily Lonergan
I contemplated a post about the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Missouri v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:16 am by Colter Paulson
Fifth Third Bancorp) and the other concerning certification issues (Young v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:16 am by Colter Paulson
Fifth Third Bancorp) and the other concerning certification issues (Young v. [read post]