Search for: "Young v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 8,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:35 am
In this post, Karen Denny, Louis-Peacock Young and Kristyna Muhlfeitova, who all work with CMS and have a special interest in public international law, preview the decision awaited from the UK Supreme Court in the matter of The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine, on which judgment is expected soon. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:01 am
Edie checked Young’s Facebook page, which was public, and discovered a photo of Young and Zaragoza together. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:29 am
” – Professor Daniel Tanovich @dtanovich In R v S. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:07 am
Bullmore v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:08 am
Louisiana (no death penalty for nonhomicide crimes) and Roper v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:45 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 2:07 pm
At issue in Young v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:33 am
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 5:20 am
In Young Mens Christian Assoc. of Greater El Paso, Texas et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 8:25 am
The Michigan Supreme Court heard oral arguments in McLain v City of Lansing Fire Department on October 6, 2016 to decide whether to grant leave to appeal. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:07 am
King was serving a seven year sentence in a young offender institute for death by dangerous driving. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 9:15 pm
Young v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:21 am
Young, Petitioner, v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 10:00 pm
For this month’s edition of Fast Break , we will be joined by healthcare litigation partners Katie McDermott and Howard Young to analyze the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit's recently affirmed $114 million judgment in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
United States - because the doctors in the case were deemed to be federal employees. [read post]
