Search for: "Young v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 8,782
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2022, 6:06 pm by Commentary:
Three authors from Brigham Young University, for instance, have noted that the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 7:14 am by JURIST Staff
And of course, all three Trump-appointed justices joined the Court’s other conservatives to overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Younging further states: “[o]nly Indigenous Peoples speak with the authority of who they are, connected to Traditional Knowledge, their Oral Traditions, their cultural Protocols, and their contemporary identity. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:23 pm by John Floyd
  Qualified Immunity   In 1989, the United States Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 10:50 am by Michael Oykhman
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Have our views of the goal or purpose of a free state changed over time? [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Alternatively, Dobbs, Bruen, and West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:24 pm by Kalvis Golde
Five years later, the court stated in Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
”[3] He further stated, “Congress’ purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 10:03 am by Michael Oykhman
The Guilty Mind (Mens Rea) In R v Tatton, 2015 SCC 33 (“Tatton”) the Supreme Court of Canada outlined the mens rea requirement for a conviction under section 434: intentional or reckless performance of the illegal act. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:18 am by Alden Abbott
This conclusion is buttressed by the tenor of the Supreme Court’s unanimous 2021 opinion in AMG Capital v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 8:13 am by Eugene Volokh
"  In a subsequent email, the defendant stated, "by underage, I meant legally permissible but young. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
Equity's concern with the protection of information can be seen as far back as 1818 and the canonical case of Gee v. [read post]