Search for: "Young v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 8,777
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2023, 3:25 pm
The airbag may not deploy in a collision if a child is found in the front passenger seat because its force could harm a young child. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Part of the GGC’s stated vision during the election was support for “evidence-based” governance. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 8:09 pm
See e.g., State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:45 am
” The complaint in B.L.R. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
From Doe v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
The plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Roberts's memo states the point clearly. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
CAAF held in 2023 in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
The diagnosis is codified by several states, including the California legislature under its Health and Safety Code as “a medically serious, sometimes fatal, matter affecting newborns and very young children,” and is generally prosecuted as a form of child abuse. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 10:58 am
Wade last year in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
The conference will focus on that dissonance, seeking proposals from experienced academics and young scholars on all sides of the argument. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In Beltran v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 8:07 am
Additional Resources: Emerson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
The five judge Bench's decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox & Kings v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 12:47 pm
” He did not mention his own reported role that year, as a young lawyer in the Reagan administration, helping prepare O’Connor for her confirmation hearing. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
From Anderson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
