Search for: "Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2015, 7:52 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., which the lawmakers characterize as “an unclear opinion related to a central provision of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) of 1978. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 11:23 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
United Parcel Service, federal courts around the country have been grappling with the proper treatment of accommodation claims. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:03 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:20 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that UPS did not have to afford a pregnant employee an accommodation relative to an essential job function. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
In Young v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:24 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:10 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., the same case the Supreme Court agreed on July 1 to hear during its next term. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
§ 2000e(k) required United Parcel Service to provide pregnant workers (such as the plaintiff, Peggy Young) with light-duty work comparable to the accommodations UPS made for other employees. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:33 am
On December 3rd, the Court will hear argument in Young v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 7:00 am
” In the case, Peggy Young worked for United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:30 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., and held that if an employer refuses to accommodate a pregnant worker on the same terms as her peers, it must have a reason that is “sufficiently strong” to justify that decision. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:06 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 2:00 am
United Parcel Services, Inc. next term. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Well, Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 3:30 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. (2014). [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:12 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., in which the Court is likely to address many of these issues, including the premise that a routine pregnancy is a disability under the ADAAA that must be reasonably accommodated. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
On December 3rd, the Court will hear argument in Young v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
On December 3rd, the Court will hear argument in Young v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., 135 S. [read post]
