Search for: "Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2015, 7:52 am by Joy Waltemath
United Parcel Service, Inc., which the lawmakers characterize as “an unclear opinion related to a central provision of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) of 1978. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
United Parcel Service, federal courts around the country have been grappling with the proper treatment of accommodation claims. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:20 am by Kelly Ann Bird
United Parcel Service, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that UPS did not have to afford a pregnant employee an accommodation relative to an essential job function. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:10 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
United Parcel Service, Inc., the same case the Supreme Court agreed on July 1 to hear during its next term. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
§ 2000e(k) required United Parcel Service to provide pregnant workers (such as the plaintiff, Peggy Young) with light-duty work comparable to the accommodations UPS made for other employees. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:30 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., and held that if an employer refuses to accommodate a pregnant worker on the same terms as her peers, it must have a reason that is “sufficiently strong” to justify that decision. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:12 am by Brian Hall
United Parcel Service, Inc., in which the Court is likely to address many of these issues, including the premise that a routine pregnancy is a disability under the ADAAA that must be reasonably accommodated. [read post]