Search for: "Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2014, 2:00 am
United Parcel Services, Inc. next term. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:10 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., the same case the Supreme Court agreed on July 1 to hear during its next term. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:12 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., in which the Court is likely to address many of these issues, including the premise that a routine pregnancy is a disability under the ADAAA that must be reasonably accommodated. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 11:23 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm
United Parcel Service 12-1226Issue: Whether, and in what circumstances, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
United Parcel Service, 12-1226, involves a UPS employee who was not permitted to return to work when pregnant because her doctor said she should not lift objects over twenty pounds. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
United Parcel Service 12-1226Issue: Whether, and in what circumstances, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am
Young v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
In Cal Fed v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
United Parcel Service 12-1226Issue: Whether, and in what circumstances, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:34 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 11-2078, slip. op. (4th Cir., Jan. 9, 2013). [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:20 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that UPS did not have to afford a pregnant employee an accommodation relative to an essential job function. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
§ 2000e(k) required United Parcel Service to provide pregnant workers (such as the plaintiff, Peggy Young) with light-duty work comparable to the accommodations UPS made for other employees. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:24 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:50 am
United Parcel Services, Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 4:04 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., 574 F.3d 169 (3d Cir. 2009). [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 5:54 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., Case No. 2009-CA-000404, involves the shooting of a young man, Mr. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:11 am
United Parcel (SD Ind., Judge Young), a 14-page opinion, Judge Evans writes:This case centers around United Parcel Service's nonfraternization policy, which forbids a manager from having a romantic relationship with any hourly employee, even an employee the manager does not supervise. [read post]
