Search for: "Younger v. Smith" Results 61 - 80 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
We vacate the judgment entered in favor of O'Neill because the district court should have abstained from deciding the merits of the case under the authority of Younger v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 12:48 pm by John M. O'Connor
Dist., 886 F.2d 1364 (2d Cir. 1989)), Sixth Circuit (Smith v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
  We discuss whether courts made the correct decision in such cases as Windsor v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
, asked the IPKat's old friend Steve Getzoff (Reed Smith LLP). [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
Cassens, et al    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitWIRE FRAUDJULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:44 am by Lyle Denniston
If there was one strategic error by counsel in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 3:52 am by SHG
There was no need for the Court to decide Smith if (all or part of) the answer came in Griggs. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
This month sees her in Los Angeles County Superior Court where she is being sued by Dawn Simonrangkir for defamation, false light invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of contract and tortious interference with economic advantage (Dawn Simonrangkir a/k/a Dawn Younger-Smith a/k/a Boudoir Queen v Courtney Michelle Love and Does 1-25 inclusive, Case No. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 1:06 pm by Cleve Clinton & Jamie Ribman
Courtney Love, a Celebritweet,  had a tweezure and unloaded on her clothing designer who responded with litigation, Dawn Simorangkir, aka Dawn Younger-Smith, aka Boudoir Queen v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
That child, and four younger children of whom he is the natural father, were taken into foster care and the father has since been charged with thirteen criminal offences, and is currently on bail awaiting trial.The Law: The current approach to deciding whether a child should give evidence was stated by Smith LJ in LM v Medway Council, RM and YM [2007] EWCA Civ 9 at paragraph 44:“The correct starting point . . . is that it is undesirable that a child should have to… [read post]