Search for: "Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. (1977) that such a right is constitutional as to at least a very narrow range of uses, where a broadcaster copies a performer’s entire act (there it was Hugo Zacchini’s Human Cannonball performance). [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:00 am by James Stewart
NCAA moves for summary judgment on Antitrust Plaintiffs’ “live broadcast” claims on the basis that student-athletes’ names, images and likeness are not used in live sporting event broadcasts for commercial purposes, and thus the First Amendment shields such broadcasts from right of publicity liability. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Jesse Lempel
Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., described the right of publicity as “closely analogous to the goals of patent and copyright law. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
An injunction was applied for but again was rejected.At the Supreme Court level there has only been one case of Zacchini v Scripps- Howard Broadcasting Company, otherwise known as the Human Cannonball case where the defendants broadcast the entirety of a 15 second clip of a guy shooting himself out of a canon. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]