Search for: "Zap v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Meade today, to view pre-trial hearings in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:56 am
Today marks the first of a possibly three-day, pre-trial motions hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
Sack, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit sided with Walt Disney Co. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 4:44 am
United States, SCOTUS zapped the incentive of qui tam relators to disclose fraud against the federal government under the Federal False Claims Act. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 1:41 pm
United States (Tribal Courts; Double Jeopardy; Court of Indian Offenses) Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 2:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:39 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:28 pm
Mulder recently stated that "we are very confident in the breadth of our intellectual property portfolio, and in the strength of our laser technology, and we intend to vigorously defend the Company against these allegations levied by Discus and Zap. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:52 pm
ACCA’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
In this case, Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:03 pm
(Kay v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
Crumpled paper copyright claim dismissed Rains v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:18 am
Let's just say the documentation around CTA's receipt of AutoCAD seemed murky. 9th Circuit cases: As far as applicable Ninth Circuit precedent, the court found an answer favorable to Vernor in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court’s 1946 decision in Zap v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:03 am
Freeze v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: Independent consultant held jointly liable for infringement: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (PatLit) Can THE JOURNAL ever be distinctive for a journal? [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:25 am
One client, for example, spent all night zapping every account with porn. [read post]
