Search for: "Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2022, 12:15 am
Bennett, 393 N.E.2d 994 (N.Y. 1979) over that of the Delaware Supreme Court in Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 4:24 pm
” (internal citations omitted) (citing Id., and Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 5:43 pm
First, the SLC (comprised of one person) was not an independent Special Committee under Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
Analysis of the Court: The court declined to apply the two-part test from Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 7:51 pm
” The Court found Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
In Sutherland v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
Applying the Delaware Supreme Court’s test for demand-excused derivative cases, Chancellor Chandler concluded that there were material questions on whether the special litigation committee was independent and whether it conducted a good faith investigation of reasonable scope that yielded a reasonable basis for its decisions.The chancery action was governed by the 1981 Delaware Supreme Court opinion in Zapata Corp v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
Under the standard set out in Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
In Zapata v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:41 am
” Instead, he suggests, courts should follow Delaware’s lead in Zapata Corp. v Maldonado (Del. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:36 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court confirmed in Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
