Search for: "Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2022, 12:15 am
Bennett, 393 N.E.2d 994 (N.Y. 1979) over that of the Delaware Supreme Court in Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Tracy Taylor
  Plaintiffs asserted that the Committee recommendations had not met the standards set out in Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 5:43 pm
First, the SLC (comprised of one person) was not an independent Special Committee under Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:58 am by Francis Pileggi
Analysis of the Court: The court declined to apply the two-part test from Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:33 am by James Hamilton
Applying the Delaware Supreme Court’s test for demand-excused derivative cases, Chancellor Chandler concluded that there were material questions on whether the special litigation committee was independent and whether it conducted a good faith investigation of reasonable scope that yielded a reasonable basis for its decisions.The chancery action was governed by the 1981 Delaware Supreme Court opinion in Zapata Corp v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 7:33 am
" The opinion also discusses the issue of independence, the third requirement that the SLC needs to satisfy pursuant to the decision in Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:41 am by Peter Mahler
” Instead, he suggests, courts should follow Delaware’s lead in Zapata Corp. v Maldonado (Del. [read post]