Search for: "Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2020, 10:20 am
Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 7:55 am
Altitude Express, Inc., sexual orientation discrimination is considered to be a subset of gender discrimination under Title VII. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 3:09 pm
Altitude Express, Inc., the Plaintiff, a tandem sky-diving instructor, alleged that he was fired after he revealed his sexual orientation to a female client. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 9:43 am
Zarda and Bostock v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 3:30 am
EEOC, Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 5:43 am
El Tribunal Supremo acordó escuchar el caso de Nueva York, Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:15 am
Altitude Express, 883 F.3d 100 (2d Cir. 2018), as a means to overrule a prior Second Circuit ruling on gay rights and employment discrimination. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:33 am
” Altitude Express and Clayton County push back, arguing that a ruling for Bostock and Zarda would “rewrite” Title VII. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
Altitude Express, Inc., in which it held that sexual orientation discrimination is an actionable form of sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:39 pm
The DOJ contends that the High Court should hold this petition pending resolution of petitions for certiorari, and potentially on the merits, in Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:39 am
” The other two consolidated cases were Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 1:35 pm
Altitude Express. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:27 am
The first of these cases concerned a pair of lawsuits from gay men who said they were fired because of their sexual orientation: Bostock and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Clayton County, GA (No. 17-1618) and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:30 pm
In Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 2:16 pm
Altitude Express, Inc, 2018 U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:54 pm
Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:44 am
Clayton County, Georgia (Consolidated with Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:15 am
Altitude Express, Inc., which held that sexual orientation discrimination is prohibited by Title VII. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:03 pm
Clayton County (Consolidated with Altitude Express v. [read post]
