Search for: "Zarda v. Altitude Express"
Results 1 - 20
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
Altitude Express, Inc., 883 F.3d 100, 137-167 (2d Cir. 2018) (Lynch, J. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
As the authors note, the Second Circuit’s decision in Altitude Express v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:30 am
Bostock comprises three consolidated cases, only two of which Professor Desai examines: Bostock itself, where the county employer discharged Gerald Lynn Bostock, a Child Welfare Services Coordinator, when his co-workers discovered that he played for a gay recreational softball league; and Altitude Express v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:42 am
The last civil case that the entire court took up was Zarda v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
EEOC, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
EEOC, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:03 pm
Clayton County (Consolidated with Altitude Express v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:12 am
By a 6-3 vote, the Court answered that question in the affirmative, changing the workplace legal environment for a population that, until only a few years ago, had no rights under Title VII.I was on the legal team in Zarda v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission), a transgender woman, and Donald Zarda (Altitude Express v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm
The Second Circuit ruled in Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:27 am
The first of these cases concerned a pair of lawsuits from gay men who said they were fired because of their sexual orientation: Bostock and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:25 pm
The Court’s decision in Bostock was consolidated with two other cases, Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
The Bostock decision consolidated three separate cases, which each dealt with alleged discrimination in the workplace; the remaining cases are Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 12:37 pm
Altitude Express fired Donald Zarda after he mentioned being gay. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 12:17 pm
Second, in Altitude Express, Inc., et al. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:20 am
Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:48 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, a consolidated case with No. 17–1623, Altitude Express, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:39 am
” The other two consolidated cases were Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 7:24 am
Altitude Express out of the Second Circuit and R.G. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:21 pm
Altitude Express, Inc., Bostock v. [read post]
