Search for: "Zarda v. Altitude Express" Results 81 - 100 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2018, 12:59 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Altitude Express, d/b/a Skydive Long Island, et al., No. 15-3775 (2d Cir. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Presumably, in 2020, the Court will decide this case and two other related cases:  Altitude Express v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:30 am by Anne Marie Lofaso
Bostock comprises three consolidated cases, only two of which Professor Desai examines: Bostock itself, where the county employer discharged Gerald Lynn Bostock, a Child Welfare Services Coordinator, when his co-workers discovered that he played for a gay recreational softball league; and Altitude Express v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:33 am by Amy Howe
Altitude Express and Clayton County push back, arguing that a ruling for Bostock and Zarda would “rewrite” Title VII. [read post]
25 May 2019, 5:43 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
El Tribunal Supremo acordó escuchar el caso de Nueva York, Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Altitude Express, Inc., in which it held that sexual orientation discrimination is an actionable form of sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]