Search for: "Zarda v. Altitude Express"
Results 101 - 120
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2020, 1:24 pm
Donald Zarda was a seasoned skydiving instructor at Altitude Express in New York. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:54 pm
Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
As the authors note, the Second Circuit’s decision in Altitude Express v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:39 am
” The other two consolidated cases were Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Altitude Express, Inc., a case pending before the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Altitude Express, Inc. and Bostock v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
Donald Zarda (who died in 2014 in a base-jumping accident in Switzerland) had been working as an instructor for a skydiving company now known as Altitude Express, while Gerald Bostock had worked as a child-welfare-services coordinator in Clayton County, Georgia. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:44 am
Clayton County, Georgia (Consolidated with Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:03 pm
Clayton County (Consolidated with Altitude Express v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 2:16 pm
Altitude Express, Inc, 2018 U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 11:26 am
Altitude Express, joining the Seventh Circuit in its decision last year. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:27 am
The first of these cases concerned a pair of lawsuits from gay men who said they were fired because of their sexual orientation: Bostock and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 8:20 am
Bd. of Comm’rs, No. 17-1618 (filed May 25, 2018), Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:19 pm
The second case (Altitude Express v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
Altitude Express. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
Altitude Express. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 10:38 am
Additional Resources: Zarda v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:00 am
EEOC, Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:00 am
EEOC, Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]