Search for: "Zoe Bedell"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2020, 12:24 pm
Zoe Bedell and John Major summarized the latest proposals to potentially limit the broad immunity that Section 230 provides for online platforms. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 12:35 pm
Zoe Bedell and John Major discussed proposals aimed at revising the immunity that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides tech platforms. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 10:50 am
As Benjamin Wittes and Zoe Bedell argue in a series on Lawfare about Twitter and designated foreign terrorist organizations (see here, here, and here), if technology companies knowingly provide service to a designated foreign terrorist organization, it constitutes a criminal act. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am
Here at Lawfare, Benjamin Wittes and Zoe Bedell discussed Force when the lawsuit was first filed in 2016 and explained how it might succeed even when others like it had failed. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Editor’s Note: Fighting terrorism online is one of those ideas that everyone agrees with in principle but disagrees on in practice. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Editor’s Note: Fighting terrorism online is one of those ideas that everyone agrees with in principle but disagrees on in practice. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
Benjamin Wittes and Zoe Bedell noted Fields v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Yet the most sustained commentary on the issue comes from Zoe Bedell and Benjamin Wittes. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:28 am
§ 230), which grants intermediaries like Google a safe harbor from liability for platform content (something Benjamin Wittes, Zoe Bedell, and others have written extensively about here). [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:45 am
” Last year on Lawfare, Benjamin Wittes and Zoe Bedell wrote about this case—in addition to a series of posts addressing the possibility of suing social media platforms as fostering terrorist organizations both in the abstract and practically, given a 2016 lawsuit against Twitter, Google, and Facebook filed for just that reason. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 1:55 pm
Zoe Bedell and I explained why in an earlier post: all of the cases in which the courts to date have immunized service providers are cases predicated on offending content of some sort. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:32 am
Accordingly, I agree with Ben Wittes and Zoe Bedell’s post suggesting that Section 230 is not necessarily an absolute bar to civil litigation. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:17 am
District Court for the Northern District of California: Fields-Twitter-Ruling-0 (PDF)Fields-Twitter-Ruling-0 (Text) Zoe Bedell and I have covered this issue at great length in the past. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 7:08 am
Ben and Zoe Bedell drew our attention to another lawsuit that alleges Facebook provides material support to terrorist groups and explained that this one might actually have a legitimate chance. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 12:15 pm
China continues to reject yesterday’s ruling by an international tribunal against Chinese territorial claims in the South China Sea, vowing to maintain its sovereignty over the region. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:03 am
Zoe Bedell wrote a post on the legal and regulatory implications of Brexit. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 12:26 pm
Britain rocked the Continent last night after voters decided last night that it was time for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:16 am
For background on the interaction of the relevant statutes, see a series of posts about the subject that Zoe Bedell and I wrote a few months ago. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 4:08 pm
There is an interesting discussion of the issues by Zoe Bedell on the Lawfare blog. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 12:35 pm
Zoe Bedell covered the May 31st hearing, while Francesca Procaccini detailed the pre-trial proceedings for June 1st and 2nd. [read post]
