Search for: "Zuckerman v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2010, 1:46 pm by Steven Siegler
Elizabeth Zuckerman, an excellent plaintiff's employment lawyer based out of Princeton, NJ, just won an important decision in the case of J.T.'s Tire Service v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in King v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:25 pm by Rich
Co. of Am., 906 F.2d 1525, 1526 (11th Cir.1990).Zuckerman v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 1:20 pm
Zuckerman's done this for a fair piece; as the opinion mentions, he was admitted to the California bar in 1965, so he's been around for a while.The settlement conference does not go smoothly. [read post]
12 May 2008, 5:17 pm
In opposition, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by Christian Romero
When you and I, and Cindy first got involved with this work, we were really worried about state actors controlling speech. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:28 pm by admin
Zuckerman stated that SOX was turning into a “robust remedy for whistleblowers,” pointing to the ARB’s decisions in Sylvester and Johnson v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Stern, a California lawyer; no dice, said the district court in Stern v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 2:40 am
Although defense counsel stated in her affirmation that the insurance carrier delayed in forwarding the summons and complaint to her office and made general statements regarding the summons and complaint having been "lost in the shuffle" by the insurance company, as well as lost or misplaced in the mail, her affirmation was not based on personal knowledge and therefore, has no probative value (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:37 am by admin
 The article quotes Jason Zuckerman, a principal attorney at The Employment Law Group® law firm, stating that the broad reading of the SOX whistleblower provisions was just what Congress intended: “Some federal judges and ALJs ignored the plain meaning of the statute and held that protected conduct is limited solely to disclosures concerning shareholder fraud,” Zuckerman said. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm by Brad Kuhn
  As a result, in Zuckerman, the court stated that “latitude must be accorded an expert in valuing such properties, and any approach that is ‘just and equitable’ may be considered. [read post]