Search for: "admin-"
Results 221 - 240
of 5,233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2024, 5:55 am
The CJC’s 2% admin fee was approved (the CRTC noted that other systems often have 5% fees) and the Commission declined to intervene in the CJC’s governance structure, ruling that its oversight role can be addressed through transparency provisions that will require annual reports from the collective. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 12:20 pm
Circuit Review – Reviewed: No Admin Law Opinions, But A High-Profile Statutory Interpretation Question appeared first on Yale Journal on Regulation. [read post]
26 Oct 2024, 7:00 am
The post Louisiana AG Sues Biden Admin after Illegal Immigrant from China enters US with ‘Drug-Resistant’ Tuberculosis first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 1:51 pm
Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris at the September 2024 presidential debate on ABC News. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 9:31 am
Also, Israel hits Hezbollah terror stronghold in Beirut despite Biden admin's objections. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
This Court has long distinguished between disciplinary proceedings and employment conditions for employees entitled to statutory civil service protections, and has held that statutory hearings are not warranted when employment eligibility conditions are enforced (see Matter of Felix v New York City Dept. of Citywide Admin. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
This Court has long distinguished between disciplinary proceedings and employment conditions for employees entitled to statutory civil service protections, and has held that statutory hearings are not warranted when employment eligibility conditions are enforced (see Matter of Felix v New York City Dept. of Citywide Admin. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 12:15 pm
' The post Judge Rebukes DeSantis Admin: ‘It’s The First Amendment, Stupid. [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 7:47 pm
Circuit issued only one opinion this week, and it wasn’t about admin law. [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 10:45 am
This blog will be quiet until early November. [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 10:34 am
Begum, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Tower Hamlets (2024) EWHC 2279 (Admin A brief note on this judicial review – brief in part because I’m not sure I actually grasp part of the challenge. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 6:19 am
https://www.higheredjobs.com/admin/details.cfm? [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Woodline Partners has six executive admins and two others who fill hybrid executive admin-receptionist positions. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 5:54 am
This case involved serious injuries to a two-year-old child and raised questions about the responsibilities and actions of caregivers. [read post]
RTX Corp defense company charged with foreign bribes in effots to get contracts with Qatari military
17 Oct 2024, 9:56 am
A full copy of the SEC Order including charges against Raytheon is attached here and makes for intereting reading. https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2024/34-101353.pdf According to the SEC’s order, Raytheon used sham subcontracts with a supplier to pay bribes of nearly $2 million to Qatari military and other officials from 2011 to 2017 to obtain Qatari military defense contracts. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:54 am
Bs Thornton pointed out that in 2020, the High Court had ruled (in R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin) at [111]) that the failure to provide humanist marriages in England and Wales was discriminatory and the Government could not simply “sit on its hands” and do nothing – to which Lord Ponsonby responded, not unreasonably, that “the previous Government chose not to respond to the Law Commission report, and we believe that,… [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 3:37 pm
Food & Drug Admin. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 10:11 am
Contact us at Cailie@ins-compliance.com or admin@ ins-compliance.com for more information. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 6:49 am
Medical malpractice occurs when a care provider fails to meet the basic standard of care or makes a notable mistake they should not have. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 1:03 pm
RR, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Enfield (2024) EWHC 2501 (Admin) This was a judicial review challenge to LB Enfield’s allocation policy for priority on the housing register, on the basis that it discrimated against disabled applicants who had the full housing duty under Part VII Housing Act 1996, who were also disabled. [read post]